|
LinusDillon
Posts: 0
Participation
   

offline

|
|
Subject: New Who
05/06/2004 02:05 GMT
|
|
|
Hi all. New around here.
I was just thinking about the new series. As far as I know, there has been no annoucement as yet regarding it's showing on Australian TV. Perhaps it would be a good idea to send off some encouragement to one of the networks to pick it up? Perhaps we could avoid ending up draging behind the UK.
If we were to do this, might I suggest we DON"t ask nine to pick it up? Their handling of any science-fiction content in the past has been very poor (bad timeslots, cumped by any minor sporting event, suddenly stopping in the middle of a season, etc). It would be great if the ABC could pick it up, but I doubt they'll be able to afford it.
Thoughts anyone?
-Linus |
|
|
|
jestear
Posts: 582
Participation
   

offline

|
|
Subject: Re: New Who
07/06/2004 01:31 GMT
|
|
|
I thought The ABC had the first refusal of BBC shows. if so that is a good thing. |
|
|
|
bnsmith
Posts: 309
Participation
   

offline

|
|
Subject: Re: New Who
20/03/2005 14:42 GMT
|
|
|
Just saw the first episode, and I liked it. I thought Christopher Eccelstone take on the Doctor was good, I enjoyed his performance.
I am still going to wait for more from Billie Piper as Rose, before I will comment on her performance, but it seems to be OK.
I look forward to the next epiosde. |
|
|
|
jestear
Posts: 582
Participation
   

offline

|
|
Subject: Re: New Who
26/03/2005 11:12 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tareth
Posts: 191
Participation
   

Admin
offline

|
|
Subject: Re: New Who
11/04/2005 09:28 GMT
|
|
|
Yeah, Chris rocks, pity he's only doing one season though. |
|
|
|
*nobody*
Posts:
Participation
   

offline

|
|
Subject: Re: New Who
25/04/2005 12:36 GMT
|
|
|
Sorry to contradict most peoples' opinions but I think that Eccleston's portrayal has completely deviated from the aestheic and persona of Doctor Who.
Gone is the Edwardian gentleman and flamboyant hair/clothes.
Gone is the eccentric time lord with an empathy for the under dog and a panchant for the apt phrase.
We now have an attitude filled, curt and 'trendy' Doctor who looks like he could put the boot in at any given soccer match in the UK.
However, before I'm hunted down for blasphemy by the SFSA, I must say that the special effects were first class (gone are the paper mache and cellophane props!) and the action was fast and intense. I think with an egocentric, attitude filled Doctor in fast paced shows, a new audience will be caught in the BBCs net - an audience that has grown up with attitude filled 'reality' TV and lots of whizz bang special effects.
I'm just a purist who enjoyed the romanticism of the enlightenment symbolism of The Doctor - something I think would be alien to the psyche of 'generation y'. |
|
|
|
grenan
Posts: 0
Participation
   

offline

|
|
Subject: Re: New Who
15/07/2005 05:12 GMT
|
|
|
I really enjoyed the episode where rose went back to meet her father. I could pick where she could put everything back to rights. It was messing around with time in a totally non-confusing way. Of course that may have had something to do with the scotch I was drinking |
|
|
|
Tareth
Posts: 191
Participation
   

Admin
offline

|
|
Subject: Re: New Who
28/07/2005 08:57 GMT
|
|
|
I enoyed it, I think Chris is cool (this is coming from a generation Xer) and I think they have really updated him well. A victorian gentleman would not have survived in a show today. |
|
|
|
*nobody*
Posts:
Participation
   

offline

|
|
Subject: Re: New Who
27/08/2005 09:22 GMT
|
|
|
"A victorian gentleman would not have survived in a show today."
Forgive my obtuseness, but why not, Tareth? |
|
|
|
|